a. The intended audience seems to be students in the LIS program as well as those that are professors and faculty in the program.
b. The journal publishes research papers, some of which have won awards at conferences. They are about topics such as collaboration in an academic context, barriers, challenges, or strengths of iSchool education, and the overall breadth and depth of the LIS program.
c. This journal is peer-reviewed. This is important because the reader knows that this material has been already gone over by peers which gives the research more credentials. For this journal in particular, there are a few articles that have been given awards at conferences by the authors peers so it is apparent that those articles in particular are well written and have important issues.
d. I find this journal interesting because it gives me better insight into the actual program that I am a part of. It talked about how others felt about different aspects of if the online program is or is not working, even research about how social networking sites are being used by the students in the LIS program to work together and connect. Since I am just focusing on the classes themselves right now, it was interesting to see others' behind-the-scenes perspectives and thoughts about the overall program.
Journal #2- Library Trends
a. This journal can be for current librarians, students currently in the LIS program, and even in some cases, parents of those that frequently attend libraries or should start.
b. Library Trends posts articles about relevant new trends and events in libraries. One example includes a Harry Potter event in an academic library which not only promotes "co-curricular involvement" but also the promotion of the library and staff (Broussard, 2013, pg. 815). Several other articles were about the presence of games and gaming in libraries and how play with story time could encourage the development of critical comprehension, coping with stress, and better social skills. (Powell, 2013).
c. Library Trends is not peer-reviewed. This doesn't really seem like it would be a problem in the case of this journal because trends aren't something that exactly need to be researched. Trends can be seen in plain sight and don't always need to be explained. This journal just reports on what kinds of events and programs that seem to be working currently in libraries so that others in the profession or general public can be aware. While there are research done in some of the articles, it seems like the overall purpose is just to inform and think about how trends change and what things are working or not working in libraries to draw people in.
d. I find this journal interesting because libraries can come in so many different shapes and sizes. An academic library is different from a medical library which is also different from a public library. In these articles, one can see if there are common trends in these different libraries or those that are different. Being from a smaller town, I'm not always aware of what libraries in big cities focus on to bring in adults and children alike so these articles give me a peek into what is popular in different sized libraries as well as how they decide to go about things like educating the public and encouraging them to read.
Broussard, Mary J. Snyder. (2013). "No Muggles in the Library Tonight! Harry Potter Night at an Academic Library." Library Trends, 61(4), 814-824. doi: 10. 1353/lib.2013.0017
Powell, Annemarie. (2013). "Get in the Game: Encouraging Play and Game Creation to Develop New Literacies in the Library." Library Trends, 61(4), 836-848. doi: 10. 1353/lib.2013.0011
Broussard, Mary J. Snyder. (2013). "No Muggles in the Library Tonight! Harry Potter Night at an Academic Library." Library Trends, 61(4), 814-824. doi: 10. 1353/lib.2013.0017
Powell, Annemarie. (2013). "Get in the Game: Encouraging Play and Game Creation to Develop New Literacies in the Library." Library Trends, 61(4), 836-848. doi: 10. 1353/lib.2013.0011
Similarities and Differences
Both of these journals would be truly useful to anyone that is either in the LIS program, or who is already a librarian. It is important for both of these groups to be aware of the current education and if and/or how things are evolving so that they can keep their own knowledge relevant to today's teachings and technology. The same is true of the trends that can be found in actual libraries. Librarians need to keep up with trends to keep people coming to their libraries and for them to stay involved. Students also need to become aware of the trends so that they will be able to more smoothly transition into their desired position in a library. If they aren't well versed on what kinds of books the young people are reading, or knowledgeable on the technology that helpful classes are being offered for, they aren't going to be able to contribute to the best of their ability.
The main difference in the journals seems to be the nature of the research and articles presented in both journals. As mentioned above, the articles in the Journal of Education for Library and Information Science were peer-reviewed and several of them had even won awards at conferences which seemed to give them more credentials when it came to the research presented. The information in the Library Trends journal, while still important, really just reflected on peoples thoughts in the profession on what was currently working and what wasn't. I think that just says that there are various aspects to the LIS field and that whether you are looking for statistics and cold hard facts or just a collection of books that has been working well at a library, you will be able to find it.